Those who choose to live together in life-long homosexual relationships; or brothers and sisters who live together and take care of one another; or two friends of the same sex who are not sexually involved but share life together in the same home—all of these may be free to live as they do, and they suffer no civil rights discrimination by not being identified as marriages. In that sense the question of marriage is not first of all a religious matter in the sense in which most people use the word "religion. Otherwise, the appeal amounts to nothing more than a request that homosexual partners be allowed to call themselves what they want to call themselves regardless of the differences that exist in reality. Opponents of equality frequently make use of flawed research studies to insinuate that allowing same-sex couples to marry will somehow harm children. It is about the nature of reality and interpretations of reality that precede the law. Both in the U.
This is the material legal matter of properly recognizing and identifying what exists and distinguishing between marriages and auto clubs, between schools and banks, between friendships and multinational corporations.
8 Reasons Why Gay Marriage Should Be Legalized
They reason that because two people of the same sex cannot procreate that they should not be allowed to marry. Decrease the Divorce Rate Allowing gays to get married, will only increase marriage rates because a fewer amount of couples will get divorced when there is more compatibility. Your email address will not be published. Marriage is a religious institution, they argue, and not one for society to tamper with. With the procreation argument, opponents of equality argue that the institution of marriage is essentially in place to assist with procreation and the raising of children. The natural world didn't create marriage, humans did.
Gay couples are already everywhere around. Given that the U. Various countries and American states which initially permitted "civil unions" for same-sex couples have subsequently enacted marriage equality legislation. Because if it is now arbitrary and unjust to recognize heterosexual marriage as something exclusive and different from homosexual relationships, then it will be arbitrary and unjust not to grant the request of other partners to call their sexually intimate and enduring relationships marriage. This position stresses that states have a constitutional right to make their own decisions about the legalization of same-sex marriage which may include banning it. There is no logical or reasonable basis for denying same-sex couples access to secular marriage laws.